Professional & recurring services
Retainers billed, collected, and chased by someone other than the partner.
The problem
Concentration makes the receivable riskier and the follow-up harder.
A firm with forty retainer clients does not have a receivables volume problem. It has a concentration problem: one client three months behind is a material part of the quarter, and that client is also someone a partner will be sitting across from next week.
So follow-up gets deferred. It falls to whoever did the work, who is the least willing person in the firm to make the call, and who has the strongest reason not to sour the relationship over an invoice that may already have been paid into an account nobody reconciled.
The result is a familiar pattern: a debtors list that is mostly accurate, a few entries that are certainly wrong, and no one confident enough in the difference to act on any of it decisively.
Obligations
What this sector actually bills.
Monthly retainer
Monthly
The core obligation. Predictable, contracted, and usually the largest line.
Service contracts
Quarterly or annual
Maintenance and support agreements with a term and a renewal date.
Project fees and milestones
On milestone
Irregular obligations against a defined schedule of deliverables.
Time and materials overage
Variable
Above the retainer's included scope. The most disputed line in the category.
Disbursements and pass-throughs
As incurred
Costs incurred for the client that are not the firm's income.
Annual renewals and uplifts
Annual
Indexed increases that need to be applied consistently and explained.
Deposits and advance fees
One-off
Held against future work, drawn down as it is delivered.
Late payment charges
Per contract
Provided for in the engagement letter, and rarely applied without thought.
Reconciliation
Where the money stops being traceable.
Client pays a round number
A payment on account that does not match any single invoice and has to be spread.
Payment from a group company
The paying entity is not the contracting entity, and neither is on the invoice.
Paid net of withholding tax
The amount received is less than the invoice by design, and the difference is not a shortfall.
Several invoices, one transfer
A client clearing three months at once, needing allocation across three obligations.
Disputed overage line
The client pays the retainer and withholds the overage, leaving a partly-settled invoice.
Disbursements confused with fees
Pass-through costs treated as income, distorting both the receivable and the revenue.
Money you hold and cannot yet attribute is reported beside the money that is properly allocated, rather than disappearing into one figure. How reconciliation works covers the general case.
- Collected
- 91.9%
- of expected
- Matched
- 98.0%
- of received
- Open items
- 12
- awaiting a person
- Expected
- $187,500100.0%
- Received
- $172,40091.9%
- Reconciled
- $168,90090.1%
- Needs review
- $3,5001.9%
- Outstanding
- $15,1008.1%
Obligations due this period
Across bank transfer, card and direct debit
Allocated to the obligations it settles
12 payments a person must look at
41 invoices still unpaid
Their side
Clients get their own view of the same record.
- Retainer position and open invoices
- Which invoices a payment settled, and what remains
- Statements for a period, without asking for them
Not a copy of your figures — the same obligations and settlements your team works from, read from the other end. How the portal works.
Following up
Separate the relationship from the follow-up.
The single most useful thing a firm can do is take receivables follow-up off the person who delivers the work. That requires a queue someone else can work from, with enough context that they are not phoning a client about money that arrived last week.
It also requires knowing which balances are genuinely disputed. A client withholding an overage line while paying the retainer is not a delinquent client — they are a client with a disagreement, and it should be routed to whoever can resolve it rather than escalated.
For the accounts that are simply not paying, the ordinary machinery applies: aging, an owner, a promise, an arrangement, and a documented escalation path that a partner can sign off on with the history in front of them.
The general machinery is on the collections page.
| Select | Account | Days past due | Balance | Next action | Row actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Halberd Logistics LtdRetainer clientacc-8104 | 13 | $3,400 | Reminder queued | ||
| Corveau GroupRetainer clientacc-8250 | 29 | $2,800 | Hold — payment in review | ||
| Stanmore & CoProject clientacc-8391 | 57 | $9,600 | Promise due today | ||
| Dalby InteriorsRetainer clientacc-8677 | 103 | $5,250 | Escalate to the partner |
- Corveau Group — A transfer of $2,800 arrived under a parent company name that is not on this account. It is almost certainly theirs.
- Stanmore & Co — Promised $4,000 by 24 August against three outstanding invoices. Kept 3 of 3 previous promises.
How Zetu works here
From obligation to standing, in this sector.
Retainers as recurring obligations
Contracted amounts on a contracted cycle, with the engagement's terms — grace, uplift, late charge — attached to the obligation.
Overage and disbursements kept separate
Included scope, overage and pass-through costs as distinct lines, so a dispute about one does not stall the others.
Payments on account allocated properly
A round-number payment spread across obligations by rule, with the remainder visible rather than absorbed.
Withholding tax handled as a fact
An amount received net of withholding is not an underpayment. Recording the difference correctly keeps the receivable honest.
Follow-up off the delivery team
A worklist someone else can run, already excluding accounts with money in review or an open dispute.
Escalation with the history attached
When a partner does have the conversation, they have the full account in front of them rather than a balance.
Capabilities
What matters most for this sector
- Monthly, quarterly and annual retainers
- Service contracts with terms and renewal dates
- Milestone and project obligations
- Overage billing separate from included scope
- Disbursements and pass-through costs as distinct obligations
- Payments on account allocated across invoices
- Group companies as payers for contracting entities
- Withholding tax recorded rather than treated as shortfall
- Deposits and advances drawn down against work
- Annual uplifts applied consistently
- Disputes routed rather than escalated
- Collections worklist independent of the delivery team
Questions
Common questions
Can Zetu handle payments received net of withholding tax?
Yes, and handling it properly matters more than it sounds. A payment short by the withholding amount is not a partial payment — treating it as one leaves a permanent residue of small balances that make the whole debtors list untrustworthy. Zetu records the deduction as what it is, so the obligation settles fully.
Do we need to replace our practice management or time-recording system?
No. Those systems own scope, time and delivery. Zetu owns what is owed, what settled it, and what to do about the rest. The sensible arrangement is that your practice system tells Zetu what to bill and Zetu owns everything downstream of that.
Our clients dispute overage lines regularly. Does that break the workflow?
It is the ordinary case, not a break. Overage is a separate obligation from the retainer, so a client can pay the retainer and dispute the overage without either being misrepresented. The disputed obligation stops aging into the collections queue and is routed to whoever can resolve it.
Related
- SubscriptionsMonthly plans, service status and reconnection after payment.
- FranchisesFranchise fees, royalties, technology and marketing contributions.
- ReconciliationEvery payment matched, and every exception surfaced as work.
- CollectionsOutstanding balances as a workflow rather than a mystery.
- StandingWhat a balance means for the relationship.
- Why ZetuWhere this sits relative to billing, accounting and payments.
Take receivables off your partners.
Bring your aged debtors list. We will show you which entries are genuinely overdue, which are disputes, and which have already been paid.